A Washington D.C. Circuit judge has rejected President Trump's appeal of a judge's ruling that the Manhattan District Attorney's office can legally subpoena for the president's tax returns, officials said.
"Contrary to the president's arguments, the committee possesses authority under both House rules and the constitution to issue the subpoena, and Mazars must comply", the opinion states.
Trump's lawyers can appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court before it goes into effect.
Tatel and Millett cite former Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis's 1926 argument that the objective of separation of powers is "not to avoid friction, but, by means of the inevitable friction incident to the distribution of the governmental powers among three departments, to save the people from autocracy".
The appeals court broadly supported the House's power to subpoena information about Trump as it investigates him and considers laws in response, calling the subpoena "valid and enforceable".
Trump could seek to challenge that decision by asking the full set of judges in the 2nd Circuit to re-hear the case. It could also grant a hearing and press pause on the subpoena while the dispute winds its way toward a final resolution in 2020 - while Trump is in the thick of a re-election fight.
Trump is also in court trying to stop the Manhattan district attorney from obtaining his tax returns. They include documents from 2011 to 2018 that the House wants for investigation into the president's reporting of his finances and potential conflicts of interest.
The move marks a significant legal blow to Trump and will likely only fuel the Democratic-led impeachment inquiry into the president. "And that is enough", Judge Tatel wrote. "And that is precisely what the Framers intended".More news: Power shut off to 21,000 customers as wildfires erupt in Southern California
More news: Pregnant Women Should Get Flu and Whooping Cough Shots, CDC Says
More news: Kevin Durant Responds To Disgruntled Knicks Fans On Twitter
Tatel was appointed by President Bill Clinton.
Eric Colombus, who served in the Justice Department under President Barack Obama, warned Rao's lonely dissent means "Dems shouldn't pop corks just yet".
A federal judge on Monday dismissed Trump's bid to block access to years of his personal and corporate tax returns, saying sitting presidents are not immune from criminal investigations.
'Upholding the subpoenas 'would turn Congress into a roving inquisition over a co-equal branch of government, ' she added.
"While we are reviewing the court's lengthy decision, as well as Judge Rao's dissent", said Jay Sekulow, counsel to the president, "we continue to believe that this subpoena is not a legitimate exercise of Congress's legislative authority".
The three-judge panel said Mazars doesn't have to comply with the House subpoena right away, granting a 7-day reprieve while Trump's lawyers file their next inevitable appeal.
The president is also embroiled in lawsuits with the House Ways and Means Committee, which is trying to get six years of Trump tax records from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and has the standing right to request similar information from the state of NY. By entrusting them to bankers and accountants, however, he provided Democrats in the Legislative Branch of the federal government with a way around his privacy concerns.
No law requires him to release the documents.