E-cigs outperform patches and gums in quit-smoking study


They said the findings were likely to be valid for dependent smokers seeking help, but may not apply to smokers who are less dependent or who try e-cigarettes for reasons other than quitting smoking.

The researchers analyzed data from three waves of the nationally representative Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study (2013-2016) in their effort to evaluate the association between prior e-cigarette use and use of other non-cigarette tobacco products with later cigarette initiation over a roughly 2-year period.

It all contributes to a confusing picture of what is healthy and what isn't - and comes as advocates claim misinformation about vaping is widespread and harmful to public health. "They were asked to set a 'quit day, ' and advised to use their e-cigarette regularly throughout the day, and whenever they felt they needed it", Przulj added.

The researchers followed the participants for one year and during that time they recorded participants' smoking habits, ratings of e-cigarette or nicotine replacement products, withdrawal symptoms, and any adverse reactions to the cessation methods. Vaping (or NRT use) after quitting may prevent an ex-smoker from reaching for a cigarette later. "The Royal College of Physicians has noted that the harm caused by smoking does not come from nicotine - but rather from other components of tobacco smoke, stating that "...the health and life expectancy of today's smokers could be radically improved by encouraging as many as possible to switch to a smoke-free source of nicotine".

In the trial, just under 900 participants who were already using UK NHS stop-smoking services were randomly assigned to either a NRT product of their choice, including combination treatments, or an e-cigarette starter pack.

Juul is one of the most popular e-cigarette companies, and many University of OR students said that it's nearly impossible to escape the Juul epidemic on campus because they see them everywhere.

E-cigarettes have become popular tobacco consumption devices, with some suggesting they could help people quit smoking.

'Evidence of effectiveness must be balanced against the short-term and long-term safety of e-cigarettes.

By the one- and four-week point, people given e-cigarettes were less likely to feel a severe urge to smoke.

More news: Polar vortex `just sort of evaporates' and U.S. Midwest warms up
More news: Surprise! A bunch of kids who weren't vaccinated now have the measles
More news: Baker Mayfield Believes in Kyler Murray

All participants were also tested to see if they were still smoking tobacco cigarettes, and had weekly one-to-one support for at least four weeks.

By the 52nd week, 18 per cent of the e-cigarette group was still off cigarettes, compared to 9.9 per cent of the standard treatment group.

"Australia can catch up with Canada, New Zealand, the United States, and the United Kingdom and legalise smoke-free alternatives to help smokers quit for good".

"If you have a method of helping people with smoking cessation that is both more effective and less costly, that should be of great interest to anyone providing health services", said Kenneth Warner, a retired University of MI public health professor who was not involved in the study.

Yet, the FDA's current and continued actions against the e-cigarette industry are impeding current smokers' access to e-cigarettes.

But Jordt noted that newer devices like the Juul pod have only recently arrived in the UK.

But as a practical matter, the investigators noted that more American smokers chose e-cigs as a cessation tool than FDA-approved treatments.

Myth #3: E-cigarettes are just as unsafe as combustibles because they contain nicotine. The other thing it does is show that the magnitude of risk is even higher for those at low risk for using cigarettes.

Armitage, who has smoked for 15 years, said he also tried nicotine patches but found they irritated his skin.